Improving Operating Room Efficiency: The Financial Impact of OR Liaisons

Rising labor costs and declining reimbursement have made Operating Room efficiency a financial priority for hospital leaders.

The OR remains the primary driver of hospital margin. Yet inefficiencies in turnover time, delayed first-case starts, and workflow variability quietly erode revenue every day.

Improving Operating Room efficiency is often discussed but rarely tied to financial accountability.

Let’s examine why throughput stability is not simply an operational goal. It is a strategic financial lever hiding in plain sight.

At the end of this article, you’ll find a brief executive assessment to evaluate your OR’s throughput stability.

The Real Margin Leak: Delayed Turnovers and First-Case On-Time Starts

Hospitals track performance metrics such as:

• First case on-time starts
• OR turnover time
• Case duration averages

Progress is often measured in averages.

But averages hide inconsistency.

When turnover time fluctuates or first-case starts drift:

• Schedules compress
• Add-on cases disappear
• Overtime increases
• Surgeon frustration rises

At one facility, a consistent 12-minute turnover drift across eight rooms resulted in the loss of nearly one full OR day per week.

It does not have to operate this way.

Adam Smith, Clinical Solutions Specialist, notes:

“Reduction in delays can facilitate more efficient surgical block usage and reduce room scheduling headaches.”

Financial Translation:

When delays decrease, block utilization improves.
When scheduling stabilizes, revenue stabilizes.

Some hospitals are implementing Operating Room Liaisons (ORLs). When structured correctly, ORLs create measurable operational change.

What Is an Operating Room Liaison (ORL)?

An Operating Room Liaison (ORL) is a dedicated procedural support professional focused on maintaining workflow stability and ensuring real-time coordination between the OR and Sterile Processing.

ORLs:

• Ensure case readiness before patient arrival
• Manage equipment transport to and from SPD
• Support room turnover execution
• Eliminate communication gaps between departments

They reduce friction inside the surgical day.

This directly improves Operating Room efficiency and throughput.

By serving as the operational “go-between,” ORLs allow nurses and surgical techs to focus on patient care while proactively handling workflow coordination.

That shift alone changes the tone of the day.

Even better: everyone operates at the top of their pay scale.

Workflow Stability Protects Hard Dollars

Operational instability carries direct financial consequences.

Elizabeth (Betty) Casey, SVP of Clinical Operations, explains:

“ORLs save hard dollars by allowing Nurses and Surgical Techs to concentrate on the patient and not the task of getting the room ready or turned over.”

When clinical staff are diverted to logistical tasks:

• OR turnover time increases
• Equipment handling errors rise
• Preventable costs accumulate
• Staff burnout builds

Betty adds:

“ORLs decrease missing items like instruments being thrown away with trash and reduce repair costs on cameras, instruments, robotic arms, and power equipment by managing transportation between the OR and SPD.”

This is not a soft benefit to overlook.

It is direct cost containment and asset protection.

Nurse Satisfaction, Surgeon Satisfaction, and Financial Performance

Workforce stability is now inseparable from OR performance.

Robin Evans, Clinical Nurse Specialist Manager, emphasizes:

“If ORLs are there to help with the work and be the runner between OR and SPD, hospital staff can focus on the patient.”

When nurses and surgical techs are not chasing instruments or coordinating transport:

• Stress decreases
• Focus improves
• Safety improves

Betty reinforces this point:

“Allowing the clinical team to focus on the patient, not the task, improves the safety of a patient undergoing a procedure.”

Improved nurse satisfaction and hospital employee satisfaction reduce turnover costs.

Improved surgeon satisfaction reduces migration risk and protects case volume.

Efficiency and satisfaction are financially linked.

Regulatory Risk Mitigation

Workflow instability also introduces compliance exposure.

Betty adds:

“ORLs mitigate regulatory risk associated with pre-cleaning of instruments and transporting items to decontamination.”

Breakdowns in pre-cleaning discipline or transport processes create survey vulnerability.

Avoiding regulatory findings protects both institutional reputation and revenue continuity.

Throughput Multiplier: Capacity Without Expansion

Many hospitals assume growth requires:

• Additional OR construction
• Extended hours
• Increased labor

But often, capacity already exists inside unstable workflow.

When turnover time becomes consistent and first-case starts improve:

• Add-on cases increase
• Block utilization improves
• Overtime decreases
• Daily throughput stabilizes

Operating Room efficiency becomes scalable.

And scalable efficiency protects margin.

The Executive Takeaway

Operating Room efficiency is not just a perioperative metric.

It influences:

• OR revenue stability
• OR turnover time performance
• First-case on-time starts (FCOTS)
• Nurse satisfaction
• Surgeon satisfaction
• Regulatory compliance

Reducing workflow variability protects both financial performance and workforce stability.

Throughput stability is not achieved through added labor alone. It requires operational structure and discipline to treat efficiency as a financial strategy.

Could your OR be performing better? Below is a brief 6-question executive assessment to evaluate your throughput stability.

6-Question OR Throughput Stability Assessment

Answer the following six questions:

1. What percentage of your first cases start on time, consistently across all rooms?

• Less than 50%
• 50-75%
• 75-90%
• 90% +

Variability between service lines often tells a deeper story than the overall percentage.

2. Is your OR turnover time predictable, or does it fluctuate significantly day to day?

• Highly variable
• Somewhat inconsistent
• Generally predictable
• Highly consistent

Consistency drives capacity. Averages hide instability.

3. How often are delays caused by equipment readiness, missing instruments, or cross-department communication gaps?

• Frequently
• Occasionally
• Rarely
• Never

If delays occur even occasionally, their financial impact compounds.

4. Are nurses and surgical techs spending time on logistical tasks that pull them away from direct patient care?

• Often
• Sometimes
• Rarely
• Never

When clinical staff chase equipment, both turnover time and nurse satisfaction suffer.

5. Do you track surgeon satisfaction in relation to schedule predictability?

• No formal tracking
• Annual survey only
• Quarterly review
• Ongoing measurement tied to performance metrics

Throughput instability is a leading indicator of surgeon migration risk.

6. If you reduced turnover variability by just 10 minutes per room per day, how much additional case capacity could your organization support annually?

• 1–2 additional cases per week
• 3–5 additional cases per week
• 5+ additional cases per week
• Not currently measurable

Most organizations underestimate the cumulative financial impact of small, consistent time recovery.

If several of these questions revealed opportunity, there may be recoverable capacity within your existing OR footprint.

Throughput instability is rarely a volume problem. It is a structure problem.

And structure is what creates scalable financial performance.

In many cases, the financial upside is already there, buried inside workflow variability.

Interested in a customized OR Throughput Snapshot for your facility?

Connect with our team to evaluate your throughput opportunity.